In their recent efforts of promoting so called “inclusion” one of the major cartoon TV published a graphic on their social networks, targeted at children, which was encouraging the use of “gender non-conforming pronouns” (hope, I got it right…).
In case you didn’t know (but hey, your kids ought to know now!) everyone can come up with their (his/her/zis/them etc…) pronouns to identify their (his/her/zis/them etc…) own gender category, and expect everyone else to follow that. Refusing to do this is disrespectful, not inclusive and simply hateful. (Source: https://www.christianheadlines.com/contributors/milton-quintanilla/there-are-many-gender-identities-cartoon-network-teaches-children-how-to-use-different-gender-pronouns.html )
So… Rejoice Fellow Citizen, your TV channel is now teaching Newspeak to your kids!
Huxley’s Brave New World and Orwell’s 1984 are not knocking at your door anymore, they have already stormed your house with their muddy boots and making themselves comfortable on your couch.
Apparently language matters. And the proponents of the great cultural revolution perfectly know that, after all they are all good Marxist scholars.
Once you hijack the language you can pave the way to people’s minds and souls.
If I can bend society around me and all my social interactions, so that they subdue to my subjective view of reality then indeed the possibilities are limitless.
I can be anything.
Anything, in that amorphous, pudding-like mass of conforming jelly (non-conforming to gender, resisting supremacies yet so obedient in whatever the corporations are telling them) that our society becomes.
And so… I can’t help but wonder.
Who is really driven by hate here?
People, who refuse acknowledging something that just plays whack-a-mole with their inherent sense of Truth?
Or people, who despise the Truth so much that they are expecting everyone around them to participate in their lie?
Who is really trying to impose their worldview and not being ‘inclusive’ enough?
People who denounce the right of others to ‘self-identify’?
Or rather those who deny the others the right to objectively observe & name reality for what it is?